The main question is whether or not man is respons...

2007-05-22T17:52:00.000-04:00

The main question is whether or not man is responsible for climate change/global warming? No one would doubt that the earth has experienced ice ages in the past.

According to Wikipedia:

"The present ice age began 40 million years ago with the growth of an ice sheet in Antarctica. It intensified during the late Pliocene, around 3 million years ago, with the spread of ice sheets

The mistake with the mainstream media is that they...

2007-05-22T15:39:00.000-04:00

The mistake with the mainstream media is that they equate showing both sides of an issue with being objective. Sometimes being objective requires one to look at an issue and then exclude one side if it is not credible.

Everything in my post is very well documented. You can call it propaganda if you want, but most of the time the use of this term is nothing more than a hollow labeling

This post is such propoganda. Try showing both sid...

2007-05-22T15:32:00.000-04:00

This post is such propoganda. Try showing both sides, or rather try taking on the actual evidence as an objective observer. Statistics can lie. If you have a graph that covers 100 years and looks like the rocky mountains and you merely show a 15 year subsection of said graph where it is on an upslope it'll look like there is a drastic rise. If you show the whole graph the trend is flat.

A relative recently sent me a link - http://www.we...

2007-05-08T12:22:00.000-04:00

A relative recently sent me a link - http://www.wecnmagazine.com/2007issues/may/may07.html. It seems a certain Prof. Bryson is doubtful of global warming. The curious thing is, when you check on his distinguished career, it turns out he was best know as a promoter of the global cooling theory - the same theory that is cited over-and-over by the deniers as proof that scientists can be very wrong.

Excellent. For clarity of thought, it helps to re...

2007-05-08T11:06:00.000-04:00

Excellent. For clarity of thought, it helps to repeat ad infinitum the credo of these in-bedded "scientists" and all the other corrupt bushies:
Its Always About Getting Away With Money.

Despite the staggering number of crimes committed to distort science and do harm for profit we CAN prosecute, fire, fine and jail
many of the perpetrators. DO SUPPORT IMPEACHMENT OF DICK

Boy that comment about global cooling just never s...

2007-05-08T02:30:00.000-04:00

Boy that comment about global cooling just never seems to go away even though skeptics like Lindzen have disavowed it. If people would do a little research they'd find out that unlike today, the great majority of scientists did not support the idea of global cooling. It was the MEDIA that insisted on stretching the truth. Climate science was in its infancy and science just did not know what

Does it disturbe you that the same scientist who w...

2007-05-08T01:50:00.000-04:00

Does it disturbe you that the same scientist who were all in agreement about the coming ice age 35 years ago were also funded by the same sources.

What an utter crock, and a typical moronic statement from the righties. Hardly any scientists back then backed the ice age in 35 years schlock that was bandied about. Yes there were a couple. Did they have an almost global consensus of

Jim, if you actually read the report by the Union ...

2007-05-07T17:38:00.000-04:00

Jim, if you actually read the report by the Union of Concerned Scientists that I linked to you would see that under the current U.S. Administration any research that runs against White House policy that is skeptical of man's impact on global warming was a quick way to shorten one's career.

What many people do not understand is that climate change and greenhouse gas research has been

Nice article. Why don't you spend an equal amount...

2007-05-07T16:59:00.000-04:00

Nice article. Why don't you spend an equal amount of time telling us who is funding the 90% that are sure about CO2. It's called the $5 billion dollar grant game. Funded by the the U.S. tell them what they want to hear or you don't get funded. I know this for a fact. Those who are speaking out are in many cases the level of Professor Emeritus, as such don't need to write grants anymore.

This pledge of money has come AFTER the scientific...

2007-05-07T11:17:00.000-04:00

This pledge of money has come AFTER the scientific community via the IPCC reports decided that the evidence was overwhelming (90% certainty). This money isn't to prove climate change is a real issue. It is the Japanese governments response to working to find ways to resolve the issue.

Regardless, it isn't the amount of money that is important. It is the intention with which the money

so what? All that money doesn't even come close to...

2007-05-07T10:25:00.000-04:00

so what? All that money doesn't even come close to this.

Japan Gives $2.1B to Stem Climate Change

http://www.cfnews13.com/News/Science/2007/5/7/japan_gives_2.1b_to_stem_climate_change.html

Comments on EnvironmentalChemistry.com: Who is funding the climate change skeptics?