tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22971475.post5143405285694850135..comments2009-11-14T08:11:52.536-05:00Ken (EnvironmentalChemistry.com)http://www.blogger.com/profile/07434682840236999820noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22971475.post-67327289483186604502007-06-02T15:14:00.000-04:002007-06-02T15:14:00.000-04:00

I have noticed some questions on other discussion boards about some details about the source of data for the graph I present above. Since I can't post to those boards, I will answer the questions here:<BR/><BR/><STRONG>1)</STRONG> The data for our graph comes from: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/renewablefuels/420f07035.htm I had provided a link to this EPA webpage mid way through the blog entry above,

Ken (EnvironmentalChemistry.com)http://www.blogger.com/profile/07434682840236999820noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-22971475.post-68708852229032276122007-06-02T12:00:00.000-04:002007-06-02T12:00:00.000-04:00

The Montley Fool has a good article on this subject titled: <A HREF="http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2007/05/31/big-subsidies-for-big-coal.aspx" REL="nofollow">Big Subsidies for Big Coal</A><BR/><BR/>The article points out the failure of the Synthetic Fuels Corporation in 1980 and how big of a gamble coal to liquids technology will be. According to Montley Fool it could cost far more than

Ken (EnvironmentalChemistry.com)http://www.blogger.com/profile/07434682840236999820noreply@blogger.com