The challenges of producing science content
By Kenneth Barbalace
[Thursday, July 20, 2006]
It is starting to look like I won't be able to publish a new article in July. I had what was potentially a really good article lined up, but the process of peer review and reference source validation is delaying the article and is threatening to sink it all together.
This is one of the challenges with producing good science related content. It isn't enough to just publish a good sounding article with lots of references; one must also make sure that the references are relevant to the article being published and support the argument being put forth in the article. Sometimes this process can derail an entire publishing schedule and for me this means I might not be able to publish any articles in July - bummer dude. :(
This is one of the challenges with producing good science related content. It isn't enough to just publish a good sounding article with lots of references; one must also make sure that the references are relevant to the article being published and support the argument being put forth in the article. Sometimes this process can derail an entire publishing schedule and for me this means I might not be able to publish any articles in July - bummer dude. :(
0 comments:
NOTICE: Comments are user generated feedback and do not represent the views and/or opinions of EnvironmentalChemistry.com.
Post a Comment
NOTICE: Comments with profanity (mild or explicit) or are otherwise offensive will NOT be posted. Self promotion spam also doesn't get posted.